This gallery contains 1 photo.
Moral philosophy often makes use of personal perceptions of moral intuitions and durable well-being (or happiness or flourishing) to judge the worth of foundational moral premises such as those underlying Utilitarianism, egoism, and virtue ethics. For John Rawls’ “reflective equilibrium … Continue reading
This gallery contains 2 photos.
What kind of moral objectivity does science provide and how might understanding morality as an evolutionary adaptation be culturally useful? Over the last 35 years, it has been becoming progressively clearer that social morality, morality dealing with other people and … Continue reading
This gallery contains 3 photos.
For over 2500 years, moral philosophers have focused on normative ideas about what people ought to do. Normative ideas are about whatever (if anything) is actually right or wrong, which may be independent of the values or cultural moral standards … Continue reading
This gallery contains 1 photo.
When trying to understand morality as an evolutionary adaptation, it is easy to get hung up on biological evolution and reproductive fitness. In the past, this has led to nonsensical ideas such as variations of “What increases reproductive fitness is … Continue reading
This gallery contains 2 photos.
Religious people may object to the idea that morality is an evolutionary adaptation on the grounds that accepting that science would mean surrendering morality to science. However, the science of morality is about means to ends, not ends themselves. Science … Continue reading
This gallery contains 2 photos.
I received many useful comments on my poster summary of the cultural utility of my proposed universal moral principle “Evolutionarily moral acts are altruistic acts that also increase the benefits of cooperation in groups”. No one admitted to thinking my … Continue reading
This gallery contains 1 photo.
The diversity, contradictions, and bizarreness of past and present enforced moral standards (cultural norms whose violators are commonly considered to deserve punishment, though sometimes only mild social disapproval) has commonly been considered obvious evidence that “There are no moral universals!”. … Continue reading
This gallery contains 1 photo.
Summary 1, without philosophy’s jargon The primary reason that people have almost always invented and enforced social moralities is that acting morally increases the synergistic benefits of cooperation within groups. “Altruistic acts that also increase the benefits of cooperation in … Continue reading
This gallery contains 3 photos.
I recently read that people are preferentially suited to understand ideas presented in the form of stories with beginnings, middles, ends with twists, and surprise characters. This certainly describes the evolutionary origins of enforced cultural norms (social morality). Perhaps some readers … Continue reading
Science and Morality 